I've made huge improvements to it on Github, but frankly it's a hard search to do and none of the methods that I tried, PCGamingWiki, SteamDB, IndieDB etc all have the same problems of not covering most of the games. And I guess there's a lot more games out there that redirects to big games, which is why Frostbite also has a way bigger number of games that should exist (the script says 200+, but EA doesn't have that many games on Steam). Upon searching, I found out that his game, "GearCity" didn't have a Wikipedia site, so it returned "Gears of War" instead, which you know, used Unreal. However, that came with a lot of problems for example, one indie dev complained that my script listed his game as Unreal, even though he used Orge3D. The script that I made uses Wikipedia's fuzzy search, so that the Steam names and the Wikipedia names doesn't have to be exactly the same. ABBEY (itsabbeywilson) instagram stories and photos download.Recent videos. If images are too big let me know, I will put in spoilers.Ĭlick to expand.Hey, I made that! As you can see from the comments of that post, and my huge disclaimer. Android phone or tablet, iphone, ipad, etc. But is quite difficult to find good market share comparison. These still not the best graphs I would like to see. I invite you to take a look at the source code and raw excel document, make modifications and draw your own conclusions!" ![]() Also AAA companies might put out more Steam apps for a single game than small developers, which might skew the data. ![]() There were simply too many games with unknown engines, corrupted data due to the game engine infobox having extra data, and searching one game's name returning another, more popular game's Wikipedia page. I cannot guarantee the accuracy of this data. "I got tired of people arguing back and forth over the popularity of game engines like Unity and Unreal, and I can't find any existing data about this, so I made a script to help me research all the notable* Steam games, and made a graph out of my findings." Not sure how vailid this graph is but here we go, from 2014 (2016 article) Point is to indicate Unity success so far. Just like history.Īppears that revenue were not the contexts of interview. If he is wrong, chances are, some other markets will point it out, or will argue. Hence no point is showing specific graphs etc. ![]() Click to expand.Every statistics from source of target company will be biased.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |